Multiple Sclerosis Research - Diagnosis, Symptoms, Treatment, Prognosis

Multiple Sclerosis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Multiple Sclerosis, including details on diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, prognosis.


Multiple Sclerosis Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Multiple Sclerosis

Books on Multiple Sclerosis

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Evaluation of response of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse to oral high-dose methylprednisolone: usefulness of MS functional composite and Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Pascual AM, Boscá I, Coret F, Escutia M, Bernat A, Casanova B

Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain. med004201@saludalia.com

To compare the usefulness of multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC) to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in assessing functional changes related to relapse. A prospective 12-week follow-up study after relapse was conducted among 14 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with oral high-dose (1 g) methylprednisolone for 3 days. MSFC and the EDSS were assessed on day 0, before treatment and, 1, 4 and 12 weeks afterwards. In relapses, EDSS (2.5 +/- 1.2 to 3.8 +/- 1.0) and z-score of the MSFC (0.15 +/- 0.58 to -0.59 +/- 0.70) worsened. After 1 week of treatment, the EDSS improved (3.3 +/- 1.2; P = 0.002) while the MSFC did not change significantly. At week 4, EDSS improvement was maximal (2.8 +/- 1.3; P = 0.001). At week 12, EDSS remained stable whereas z-score continued improving (0.26 +/- 0.74). z-9peg-hole-test was the most sensitive subtest. There was correlation between baseline values of both scales (-0.620, P < 0.05) and between changes due to relapse (-0.535, P < 0.05). 78.5% of patients had improved at week 4 (35.7% at week 1). There were no serious adverse effects. MSFC and the EDSS were sensitive to changes due to relapses, although the dynamics for restoring baseline function were different. Our data support the usefulness of both scales in clinical trials, providing complementary information about outcome of MS patients with relapses.

Published 22 February 2008 in Eur J Neurol, 15(3): 284-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Multiple Sclerosis Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Multiple Sclerosis Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Multiple Sclerosis Books

The MS Solution: How I Solved the Puzzle of My Multiple Sclerosis

The MS Solution: How I Solved the Puzzle of My Multiple Sclerosis